Skip to content
Mikroplastikveri

Mikroplastikveri

A blog by an academic who works on microplastics. I summarise new studies, explain how measurements are made, and check how well the claims that keep appearing in the news hold up against the evidence. Every statement comes with its source.

Latest posts

Latest posts

All posts

Behind every "researchers found X microplastic particles" there is a long chain of lab work.

Every link in that chain can change the result.

  • Plastic
  • Looks like plastic
  • Organic matter
  • Mineral
  • Contamination from outside
  • Added in a known amount

Illustrative drawing; the particle counts are not measurements.

1. Collecting the sample

Water, sediment, food or tissue: how much is collected, and how, determines from the outset which particles can be counted at all. The review scores sampling method and sample size separately [10].

Question to ask: Is the sample large enough for the particle size being targeted and the concentration expected?

2. Cleaning up the sample

A sample contains a lot besides plastic: organic matter, minerals, tissue. To remove these, the sample usually goes through a digestion step. In the review, this step ("sample treatment") was among the criteria with the lowest average scores [10].

Question to ask: What treatment was used, and was it shown to remove enough of the non-plastic material?

3. Identifying the polymer

The key distinction here: is a particle called plastic because of how it looks, or because of its chemistry? The polymer type should be confirmed, preferably with FTIR or Raman spectroscopy, Py-GC/MS or TGA-GC/MS [10].

Question to ask: Was the polymer confirmed chemically?

4. Controlling contamination

Samples can also pick up particles from outside while in the lab. A blank is a control that goes through every step of the procedure but contains no sample. If particles turn up in the blank too, that count has to be taken into account when interpreting the real sample.

Question to ask: Were blanks used, and are their results reported?

5. Testing recovery

A positive control means adding a known amount of plastic to a sample and measuring how much of it the method gets back. This too was among the criteria with low average scores in the review [10].

Question to ask: Do we know how much plastic the method misses?

Why do results vary so much?

Across the 50 studies reviewed, reported concentrations ranged from roughly 0.01 to 100 million particles per cubic metre, a spread of about ten orders of magnitude [10]. So a number from one study should not be compared with a number from another without first looking at how each was obtained.

How are microplastics measured?

[10] Koelmans, A. A. et al. (2019). Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water. doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.054

  • The Basics

    What microplastics are, the main types and where they come from. A good place to start. 1 post

  • Health

    How people are exposed to microplastics and what the evidence says about health effects. 1 post

  • Methods and Measurement

    Sampling, lab analysis and quality control, and what makes a measurement trustworthy or not. 1 post

  • New Studies

    Summaries of published papers: what was done, what was found, and where the limits are. 1 post

  • Policy and Regulation

    Bans, restrictions and international negotiations: what is in force and what is still being discussed. 1 post

Start here

New to the subject? These three posts cover the basics in order:

  1. What are microplastics, and where do they come from?

    Definitions, types and main sources.

  2. How are microplastics measured?

    What to look for when reading a study.

For journalists and researchers

For questions about a post, corrections, or a written comment, see the Contact page. Every post ends with a reference list and citation details.